Skip to main content

This markets days are numbered

A correction leading to a downturn is likely before serious issues are resolved, such as:

Central Banks are in a Blind Alley
Central banks can not readily afford to be even more accommodating than they already are towards any market downturns.  Even without doing anything much they are reneging on their overdue expectations to withdraw liquidity and tighten rates.  The main support they can offer is confidence in their operations but this confidence will not last for long in the face of ineffective action during a market downturn.   

Insanely low Volatility
The market has become a reflection of algo driven automated trading, relying on mean reverting methods with an emphasis to dampening volatility.

This is not a normal state.  Never before has the vix been so low, so much for so long.  This is for both realised and implied or anticipated volatility.  This is indicative of a central bank controlled and manipulated market.

Politics:
Debt ceiling debate,
Health care fiasco,
Tax reform,
Intrigue of the investigations behind the USPTO
A crisis in confidence in the lack of action in Washington
Unfunded pension liabilities
Instability in relations with Russia
The war drums beating for North Korea.



Why the arguments in Support of the Bullish Case for the Market are flawed

Ultimately the valid warning signs of an over extended market are being turned round to suggest that they represent a new area of growth and stability.  This flawed argument is then backed by a unrealistic faith in central banks to overlook the dilemmas coming crisis central bank policy is entering into. 

1. Volatility
There are arguments that suggest the low Volatility of the market is not a danger sign, but represent a new era of growth and stability.   This is a naive view.  There is ample evidence to show that the Volatility is dampened by Central bank actions and liquidity.  Therefore, to say the cause is the natural wellsprings of economic growth and that therefore the real cause (Central bank liquidity) can be withdrawn is a bad trick and ought to fool no one.

Its like eating a obese man doing a days exercise and claiming that the weight increase is muscle and the result of a new era of fitness.

In fact, volatility is typically low when financial asset classes are at their peak, across the board.

Low Volatility creates a market that is over leveraged, based on expectations of continued low volatility.  Therefore Low Volatility is a destabilising influence in the event of a correction.  These investments in assets linked to Low Volatility runs in hundreds of billions and all need to be deleveraged in a short time, in a time of limited liquidity.

2. Private Sector Funding. 
Signs are the private Sector is investing more and hence the Central banks can withdraw liquidity.

In fact, private sector borrowings are fantastically high, as is leverage and borrowings in the market (based on the premise of low Volatility continuing)

3. Central Banks
The argument is that with economic growth, reflation and private sector funding that the central banks can keep to expectations to with draw liquidity and tighten rates.  These premises are flawed example of  circular reasoning because they the premises are ultimately a result of central bank action in first place




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Canadian Black Swans

The IMF reports a risk of sharp correction in the Canadian housing market triggering negative feedback loops in the economy This comes with possible  renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement  and potential U.S. trade protectionism likely to hurt Canada's economy, with increasing tariffs and a further decline in oil prices House prices in Toronto and Vancouver have more than doubled since 2009, far above US growth and the economy relies on the construction sector Canadian Ten year yields have shot up to their highest in the last 2 years "There's a level of admiration I actually have for China. Their basic dictatorship is actually allowing them to turn their economy around on a dime." Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau

Everything Shiny with the S&P 500?

Earning for the S&P are coming in at over $130, above expectations, with every prospect of rising further in coming years.   Share buybacks ensure a healthy prices and dividends. How to price in coming disasters?    Unfunded pensions, absurd P/E ratios, a coming lack of central bank liquidity, rising rates, lack of productivity etc etc Will these factors show up as a lack of confidence, and hold back any recovery following a correction?   Probably. How likely is a correction? Theres immense correlation between the Fed’s Balance sheet and the S&P 500.   Both the Fed and the EU central bank are making noises about withdrawal of money from the system, This makes a correction a real concern but can we be assured of a recovery?